Re: Preempt & Xfs Question

[Chris Wedgwood]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:24:13PM +0000, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:

> Well calling such a internal function (__function) is not a cleaning
> coding style but works best :-) .

__foo does NOT mean it's an internal function necessarily or that it's
unclean to use it (sadly Linux has pretty vague (nothing consistent)
rules on how to interpret __foo versus foo really.

> Combined with the current_cpu() fixes I mentioned, it looks like
> this:

(1) your patch is mangled/wrapped

(2) this is fixed in CVS already (for maybe a week or so now?)

> I'll submit it to the mailinglist as a seperate patch, so Linus can
> apply it to the current Kernel.

XFS patches/suggestions should go to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx and the
maintainers there can comment as needed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/