Re: ub: oops with preempt ("Sahara Workshop") [u]

[Pete Zaitcev]

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:38:15 +0200, "Martin Schlemmer [c]" <azarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 10:02 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

> > I admit that the code should be locked properly instead, but the global plan
> > is to drop all P3 tagged printks anyway. So let it be guarded for the moment.

> Sorry for the delay, but I have not had any time to really test this
> again.  I did some minor testing, and only after really working it,
> I could get an oops, but not nearly the same (think it was deeper into
> the scsi layer or maybe kobject stuff).

This is strange, because ub hasn't got any connection with SCSI layer.

Without trying to deflect the blame for improper locking in ub, I have to
ask, does it all work without the preempt for you?

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/