Re: ub: oops with preempt ("Sahara Workshop") [u]

[Martin Schlemmer [c]]

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 10:02 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

Hi,

> I admit that the code should be locked properly instead, but the global plan
> is to drop all P3 tagged printks anyway. So let it be guarded for the moment.
> 

Sorry for the delay, but I have not had any time to really test this
again.  I did some minor testing, and only after really working it,
I could get an oops, but not nearly the same (think it was deeper into
the scsi layer or maybe kobject stuff).

Will see when I can get some time to try and generate some consistent
traces if any.


Thanks,

-- 
Martin Schlemmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part