Re: [PATCH] Remove pointless <0 comparison for unsigned variablein fs/fcntl.c

[Timur Tabi]

Jesper Juhl wrote:

> My understanding of it is that it was just an example of how code that 
> generated warnings about limited range of datatype could actually be 
> perfectly fine.

But if the example doesn't make any sense, then how does it prove the point?

--
Timur Tabi
Staff Software Engineer
timur.tabi@xxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/