Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86

[Adrian Bunk]

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> >And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the 
> >following dependencies will be correct both before and after this 
> >change:
> >- (X86 && !X86_64)
> >- (X86 && X86_64)
> >
> 
> This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in
> the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you
> meant:
> 
> (X86 || X86_64)

Yes, thanks for the correcting my typo.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/