Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

[Martin J. Bligh]

> Martin wrote:
>> I don't think anyone is suggesting that either system as is could replace
>> the other ...
> 
> I'm pretty sure Andrew was suggesting this.
> 
> He began this thread addressing me with the statement:
>> 
>> And CKRM is much more general than the cpu/memsets code, and hence it
>> should be possible to realize your end-users requirements using an

Note especially the last line:

>> appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller.

So not CKRM as-is ...

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/