Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Mon Oct 04 2004 - 10:34:57 EST


Martin wrote:
> I don't think anyone is suggesting that either system as is could replace
> the other ...

I'm pretty sure Andrew was suggesting this.

He began this thread addressing me with the statement:
>
> And CKRM is much more general than the cpu/memsets code, and hence it
> should be possible to realize your end-users requirements using an
> appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/