Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH/RFC] exposing ACPI objects in sysfs

From: Alex Williamson
Date: Tue Sep 21 2004 - 14:14:40 EST


On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 21:06 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:26:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > +struct special_cmd {
> > > + u32 magic;
> > > + unsigned int cmd;
> > > + char *args;
> > > +};
> >
> > Talk to Andi Kleen; passing such structures using read/write is evil,
> > because (unlike ioctl) there's no place to put 32/64bit
> > translation. Imagine i386 application running on x86-64 system.
>
> Yes, Pavel is right. Please don't pass pointers by read/write
> because it cannot be 32bit emulated.

All pointers are actually interpreted as offsets into the buffer for
this interface. They are not actually pointers. I believe the 32bit
emulation problem is limited to an ILP32 application generating data
structures appropriate for an LP64 kernel. While difficult, it can be
done.

Alex

--
Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/