Re: [PATCH 2.4] gcc-3.4 more fixes

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:13:26PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:41:46PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote:
> >
> >>>>Ozkan,
> >>>>
> >>>>This are just warning fixes right?
> >>>>
> >>>>I dont like this patches, that is, I'm not confident about them.
> >>>>
> >>>>Let the warnings be.
> >>>
> >>>For gcc-3.4 they're warnings. For gcc-3.5 they'll cause compiler
> >>>failures (that's what mikpe says on cset-1.1490, too)
> >>
> >>As a side note, almost all of them are in 2.6 anyway (can't
> >>honestly remember which aren't)
> >
> >
> >Have you nocited the deadly mistake you made I showed with the grep?
> >
> 
> Oopss :/  Than 2.6 has the same deadly thing. I'm too trusting I
> guess..  The correct thing should be to change "if (!(PRIV(dev) ="
> into "if (!(dev->phy_data =", right?

I think so yes. A network driver expert can confirm this for us.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/