Re: [PATCH 2/14] kexec: i8259-sysfs.x86_64

[Andrew Morton]

ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> The i8259 does not yet have sysfs support on x86_64

umm, yes it does.  It went into Linus's tree post 2.6.8.1.

I added the below make-it-compile patch.  Please check it.

--- 25/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c~kexec-x86_64-i8259-fixes	2004-08-21 16:22:54.833282048 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c	2004-08-21 16:23:42.330061440 -0700
@@ -343,44 +343,6 @@ spurious_8259A_irq:
 	}
 }
 
-static int i8259A_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
-{
-	init_8259A(0);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int i8259A_shutdown(struct sys_device *dev)
-{
-	/* Put the i8259A into a quiescent state that
-	 * the kernel initialization code can get it
-	 * out of.
-	 */
-	outb(0xff, 0x21);	/* mask all of 8259A-1 */
-	outb(0xff, 0xA1);	/* mask all of 8259A-1 */
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static struct sysdev_class i8259_sysdev_class = {
-	set_kset_name("i8259"),
-	.resume = i8259A_resume,
-	.shutdown = i8259A_shutdown,
-};
-
-static struct sys_device device_i8259A = {
-	.id	= 0,
-	.cls	= &i8259_sysdev_class,
-};
-
-static int __init i8259A_init_sysfs(void)
-{
-	int error = sysdev_class_register(&i8259_sysdev_class);
-	if (!error)
-		error = sysdev_register(&device_i8259A);
-	return error;
-}
-
-device_initcall(i8259A_init_sysfs);
-
 void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/