Re: Merge I2O patches from -mm

[Markus Lidel]

Hello,

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > add a controller_add and add controller_remove method, taking a typesafe
> > > i2o_controller * instead of the multiplexer.
> > I had this before, but i want the notification also for I2O devices, 
> > because the driver model won't call probe functions for devices, which 
> > are already occupied by a other driver.
> Then please add more methods.  Multiplexer calls are an extremly bad idea.

Okay, i prefer type safety too, but i also don't like too many functions...

What do you think about that:

enum i2o_notify {
	ADD = 0;
	REMOVE = 1;
}

i2o_notify_controller(enum i2o_notify, struct i2o_controller *);
i2o_notify_device(enum i2o_notify, struct i2o_device *);



Best regards,


Markus Lidel
------------------------------------------
Markus Lidel (Senior IT Consultant)

Shadow Connect GmbH
Carl-Reisch-Weg 12
D-86381 Krumbach
Germany

Phone:  +49 82 82/99 51-0
Fax:    +49 82 82/99 51-11

E-Mail: Markus.Lidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL:    http://www.shadowconnect.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/