Re: [PATCH]

From: Jean-Luc Cooke
Date: Fri Aug 06 2004 - 08:08:15 EST


On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:58:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I'd strongly suggest against doing any "raw crypto access". Zero-copy
> is often just a complicated way of doing things slowly, all in the name of
> some benchmark performance.

I hear you, these are all desirable things and I hate trying to be the black
sheep - but would random.c make sense in being the exception since the
outward looking interfaces (random_write for example) all use const char*
type as arguments?

Keeping the existing random.c interface and using crypto-api's scatter-gather
interface are kind of contradictory ... or and I really missing something
important (likely)?

JLC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/