Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jul 23 2004 - 01:54:43 EST
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >look at my latest patches to see how it's done. We can preempt softirq
> >handlers via lock-break methods. The same method doesnt work in the idle
> Are you referring to this patch?
no, i'm referring to this one:
(disregard the debugging induced complexity.)
> Surely something similar could easily be done for irq context softirq
> processing with a patch like my earlier one? And it would prevent
> spilling to ksoftirq when a RT thread isn't waiting to run.
the softirq-defer patch is just the first step to enable lock-break of
softirqs - the lock-break is done in the -I1 patch.
(what patch do you refer to via 'my earlier one'? Did you mean your 'if
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/