Re: Recommended compiler version

[Francois Romieu]

John Bradford <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> In my opinion, code that doesn't compile with 2.95.3 is broken - 2.95.3 is

If you are asking for technical details, please read the thread ending
at: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-05/msg00440.html

[...]
> Basically, 2.95.3 is something of a point of reference, so it only makes
> sense to throw it out once we have a new point of reference.

It makes no sense to religiously recommended 2.95.3 if it is known broken.

If nobody comes with a better approach, I'll simply submit a patch to
remove the 2.95.3 recommendation (+ #error for the driver as suggested by ak).

--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/