Re: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100?
From: J. Ryan Earl
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 06:28:17 EST
I've always had good results with the e100 driver:
Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.3.36-k1
Copyright (c) 2003 Intel Corporation
e100: selftest OK.
e100: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Connection
Hardware receive checksums enabled
cpu cycle saver enabled
Jan De Luyck wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello List,
I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my 2.6 kernel configuration on my
trusty SMP HP Netserver LC3, which comes shipped with 2 identical intel Pro
Ethernet 100 mbit cards:
0000:00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 05)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NetServer 10/100TX
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 16
Memory at fecfd000 (32-bit, prefetchable)
I/O ports at fcc0 [size=32]
Memory at fed00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
I'm wondering what driver is the "best" one to use? Judging by the comments in
the files, the e100 driver seems to be the best maintained, though I'm
probably wrong ;p
The website that is referenced in the eepro100 driver is no longer available
(returns a 404).
If someone can shed some light on this, thanks!
Jan
- --
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind.
-- Mark Harrold
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAqwWhUQQOfidJUwQRAt7wAJ9H/wapw68XfrYHgV44tf4MfqIUeACdFBvF
R4Aupx+q9AlCKEWjtAE2v2c=
=jQHj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/