Re: IDE throughput in 2.6 - it's good!

[Nick Piggin]

FabF wrote:
> 	Here's what we can call a server direction.2.6 is unbeatable there due
> to IO scheduler (i.e. As-iosched, cfq and noop rock'n'roll)

Well, which one were you using just now? AS I assume?

> 	There are no good conclusions at all although ,at this state of
> development, IMHO, 2.4 seems more 'client friendly' and 2.6 server
> oriented in this chapter.

IO scheduler wise, AS should be good for "clients" (ie. desktop)
because it is the desktop where AS's possible small throughput
regressions are not a big problem even if they did arise.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/