Re: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain

[Ihar 'Philips' Filipau]

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I came across an idea, how Linux could allow binary modules, still having
> reasonable control over them.
>
> I am not advocating for binary modules, nor I am trying to make their life
> harder, this is just an idea how it could be done.
>
> I'll try to make it short, details may be discussed later, if any interest
> arises.
>
> A binary module is "considered good" if

  I belive that you forgot to make "The Point."

  And "discussion" (good vs. bad isn't discussion, but flames) went in 
wrong direction.

  Be constructive. For example: Let's aks h/w producers making at least 
glue layer open source (bsd or something), so people eventually might 
help to maintain this glue layer.
  How it can help? - producer with time may move bigger parts of driver 
into open source domains.
  How it can gets screwed? - producer might just start liking when 
someone is doing his work for him. Some license a-la GPL to not let glue 
layer to slip into binary only domain back must be in place.

  This could be a good starting point for h/w producers and linux 
comunity as a whole.

  Saying Good/Bad is just B.S. - helps no-one.
  Building bridges between comunity and producers - might improve and 
deepen relationships. And that's what I hope for.

P.S. nVidia driver might be an example: IIRC nVidia engineers were 
saying that they have four 2/3rd party code parts inside driver, which 
they are not able to open source/GPL. But open source glue layer to 
connect this "tainted" 4 parts with Linux kernel might help everyone: 
nVidia, LK and even those four companies. At least I hope for this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/