Re: vmscan.c heuristic adjustment for smaller systems

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:33:33PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This doesn't match your first response. Anyway, this one is gets
>> scrapped. I guess if swappiness solves it, then so much the better.

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:52:57PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> Huh?  Where do you see a discrepency?  I don't think I claimed that
> the test program performance changed.  The noticeable difference is in
> interactivity once the page cache fills.  IMHO, 30 seconds to do a
> file listing on /proc is extreme.

Oh, sorry, it was unclear to me that the test changed anything but
swappiness (i.e. I couldn't tell they included the patch etc.)


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/