Re: SATA support merge in 2.4.27

[Andre Hedrick]

Since we are going over the cliff, lets get there faster!

Has 2.2 or 2.0 ever been audited for security issues, and fixed?

Whee this is fun!

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, John Bradford wrote:

> Quote from Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > 
> > --=-De0mPL9BnMYZGB8TurTV
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > 
> > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:20, John Bradford wrote:
> > > Quote from Andre Hedrick <andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ?  How could that be ?
> > >=20
> > > It hasn't exactly been audited for security issues yet.
> > 
> > neither has the biggest part of the 2.4 codebase.
> 
> A valid point, but last time I checked, there were known exploits that had
> been fixed in 2.4 but not in 2.6.
> 
> John.
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/