Re: kernel stack challenge

[Patrick J. LoPresti]

Timothy Miller <miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think 100K is rather large for an interpretor to be included in the
> kernel, but putting that aside...

I think we are all putting that aside for the moment.  :-)

> It's a limited number of people who would actually write these
> policies. If those people follow certain coding rules, then we CAN
> have such bounds, by convention.  Yes, those bounds could be violated,
> but if the programmer (not sysadmin -- they would never write these
> things in LISP) breaks something, it's just a bug.

Fair enough.  But then I wonder how many of Lisp's advantages you
would lose.  I am having trouble imagining "statically bounded Lisp"
without being so stylized as to hardly be Lisp at all.

 - Pat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/