Re: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping?

[Russell King]

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Russell King wrote:
> 
> > Since we have drivers/serial/dz.[ch] now merged, is there a reason to
> > keep drivers/char/dz.[ch] around any more?  I notice people keep doing
> > cleanups, but this is wasted effort if the driver is superseded by the
> > new drivers/serial/dz.[ch] driver.
> 
>  drivers/char/dz.[ch] has been verified to work on real hardware, at least 
> with 2.4.  Can the same be said of drivers/serial/dz.[ch]?  If so, then 
> the former can be removed from the mainline.

Ralf has verified that it works before he submitted it to Linus, so
I guess that means that it does "work on real hardware".

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/