Re: finding out the value of HZ from userspace

From: Peter Williams
Date: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 19:11:58 EST


Jamie Lokier wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:

HZ doesn't mean nothing, esp when we go to a tickless kernel...


As explained several times in this thread, HZ is meaningful because it
affects the rounding in select/poll/epoll/setitimer. A few userspace
programs with low jitter soft-RT timing requirements need to
compensate for that rounding and/or deliberately synchronise
themselves with the tick.

Such programs can determine HZ experimentally and lock onto the tick
in the manner of a PLL, but it would be nice to simply be able to
have the value, to reduce the number of control variables.

When we go to a tickless kernel and offer high-resolution timers to
userspace, then it will be irrelevant. Until then, or if the kernel
goes tickless but limits the resolution of timers for efficiency, the
value of HZ is still relevant.

The resolution will always be limited. That's the nature of digital systems. Unlimited resolution would require real "real" numbers and that's not possible. The nearest you get on a digital system is the floating point APPROXIMATION to real numbers.


Not to get irritatingly back to the subject of this thread or
anything, but... is the value of HZ reported to userspace anywhere?

I don't think so. There are those (I'm not one) who insist that to do so would be a bug.

IMHO, as I've said several times, USER_HZ should be changed to be equal to or greater than HZ. In fact, if having USER_HZ greater than HZ would still make it unusable for your purposes, I'd change that opinion to say USER_HZ should be equal to HZ (or, in other words, cease to exist).

Peter
--
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist peterw@xxxxxxxxxx
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/