Re: suspend/resume support for PIT (time.c)

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 12:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > +static int pit_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, u32 state)
> [snip]
> > +static int pit_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
> > +	xtime.tv_sec = get_cmos_time() + clock_cmos_diff;
> > +	xtime.tv_nsec = 0; 
> > +	write_sequnlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> [snip]
> >  static struct sysdev_class pit_sysclass = {
> > +	.resume = pit_resume,
> > +	.suspend = pit_suspend,
> >  	set_kset_name("pit"),
> >  };
> 
> As none of this really has anything to do w/ the PIT, and to avoid
> confusion w/ the PIT timesource code, could we rename this to
> "time_suspend" and "time_resume"?

Applied, altrough I'll not try to push it for a while. (I'm not sure
if Andrew applied previous patches and do not want to clash).

								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/