Re: [patch] sched-HT-2.6.0-test11-A5

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Why not per_cpu for __rq_idx[] and __cpu_idx[]? This would have the
>> advantage of residing on node-local memory for sane architectures (and
>> perhaps in the future, some insane ones).

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:21:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> agreed, i've changed them to be per-cpu.
> new patch with all your suggestions included is at:
>   redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-SMT-2.6.0-test11-C1
> it also includes the bounce-to-cpu1 fix from/for Anton.

This looks pretty good, thanks.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/