Re: [NFS] RE: [autofs] multiple servers per automount
From: Ian Kent
Date: Thu Oct 23 2003 - 19:48:41 EST
Thanks for the description.
I thought it was bad to call a function that could block while
holding a lock. At least I was close to right this time.
I wasn't aware of the badness I'll see what I can find.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Mike Waychison wrote:
>
> Ingo's patch simply moved the allocation outside the spinlock.. See my
> later patch about moving the allocation to and __init section, which is
> probably the cleaner thing to do and doesn't require grabbing the page
> and using it conditionally.
>
Missed that when I returned to it. Found it now.
That is clearly a better way to do it.
I there any chance this would be accepted into 2.6.0?
I think it's quite important, hopefully others do as well.
--
,-._|\ Ian Kent
/ \ Perth, Western Australia
*_.--._/ E-mail: raven@xxxxxxxxxx
v Web: http://themaw.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/