Re: freed_symbols [Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]]
From: David Woodhouse
Date: Sun Oct 05 2003 - 09:16:10 EST
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 06:56 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> You're forgetting that what the GPL says doesn't matter if it is
> unenforceable.
If the licence is invalid then there exists no licence and it is an
offence to use the software in question at _all_.
> Remember all the people yelling at me that they can
> reverse engineer BK in spite of any no-reverse-engineering clauses?
> That same logic applies to the GPL, you can't have it both ways.
I wasn't doing that yelling.
> It doesn't matter what you think, or I think, or Linus thinks. What
> matters is what is legal and what isn't.
Agreed.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/