Re: sys_vserver

[Chris Wright]

* Rik van Riel (riel@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
> > > it's own.  It could be similar to LSM, e.g.  allow pluggable
> > > virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.
> > 
> > Doesn't sound like 2.6 material.
> 
> Maybe not, but it does sound like something we want to be
> ready by the time 2.7 is forked ;)

Yes, good point ;-)  And I do agree it's a useful concept.
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/