Re: sys_vserver

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
> * James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
> > it's own.  It could be similar to LSM, e.g.  allow pluggable
> > virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.
> 
> Doesn't sound like 2.6 material.

Maybe not, but it does sound like something we want to be
ready by the time 2.7 is forked ;)

Also, some parts of the virtualisation code might be 2.6
material after all, depending on how simple/complex the
code in question is.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/