Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. modem cards

From: Norman Diamond
Date: Sun Sep 14 2003 - 05:47:11 EST


"Russell King" <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> replied to me:

> > In file 8250_cs.c:
>
> Its going to get renamed back to serial_cs shortly.

OK.

> > Later in the same source file, calls to register_serial() and
> > unregister_serial() compile but fail during execution. Of course in order
> > to make it execute in the first place I have to manually modprobe 8250_cs,
> > because of the reason mentioned above. /var/log/messages gets reports that
> > those symbols are unknown.
>
> I have no idea how you managed that. The configuration subsystem does
> not allow you to build 8250_cs.c as a module without building 8250.c in
> some manner, and 8250.c provides those symbols.

I built 8250.c as a module, but might have neglected to modprobe it. Since
a manual modprobe of 8250_cs also neglected to automatically modprobe its
dependency 8250, there might be breakage in modprobe, or this might just be
additional breakage in the naming of 8250 vs. serial.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/