Re: devfs to be obsloted by udev?

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically
> >>give the same info.
> >
> >What "two directories"?  udev can handle /dev.  What other directory are
> >you talking about?
> 
> in your readme you  use the example of making the device root for udev 
> /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't 
> be loaded immediately at kernel boot.

That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable
:)

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:20AM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> >>I dont see the real benefit in having two directories that basically
> >>give the same info.
> >
> >What "two directories"?  udev can handle /dev.  What other directory are
> >you talking about?
> 
> in your readme you  use the example of making the device root for udev 
> /udev ... I thought that was the official suggestion since udev couldn't 
> be loaded immediately at kernel boot.

That's my suggestion today if you want to have a machine that's usable
:)

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/