Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two

• Next message: Viaris: "Re: kernel 2.6.0-test2 hang in Starting RedHat Network Daemon"
• Previous message: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• In reply to: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Reply: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [poup@poupinou.org]
>
> > o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected
> > o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu
>
> Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management.

Because it is a power management option. :)

CONFIG_PM is a dummy option, it does not link any code into the kernel
by itself.

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Viaris: "Re: kernel 2.6.0-test2 hang in Starting RedHat Network Daemon"
• Previous message: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• In reply to: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Reply: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST