Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two

From: Ducrot Bruno (poup@poupinou.org)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 11:24:28 EST

Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Previous message: Antonio Vargas: "Re: [Q] Question about memory access"
In reply to: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:15:05PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote:

> o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected
> o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu

Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management.

-- Ducrot Bruno

-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Previous message: Antonio Vargas: "Re: [Q] Question about memory access"
In reply to: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Reply: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST