Re: RFC on io-stalls patch

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 06:22:07 EST


On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 06:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Sorry, but I think that is nonsense. This is the way we have always
> worked. You just have to maintain a decent queue length still (like we
> always have in 2.4) and there are no problems.

The memory pinning problem is still real - and always has been. It shows up
best not on IDE disks but large slow media like magneto opticals where you
can queue lots of I/O but you get 500K/second

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:56 EST