Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 15:32:19 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Previous message: Pete Clements: "Re: 2.5.73 -- Uninitialised timer! (i386)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 22:12, David S. Miller wrote:
> I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just
> stupid. We're saying what "bits" the device supports when
> it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask.

however it might be a good idea to define a PCI_DMAMASK_64BIT (and 32
bit) with the right values ?

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Previous message: Pete Clements: "Re: 2.5.73 -- Uninitialised timer! (i386)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:17 EST