Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 15:12:28 EST

Next message: Daniel Gryniewicz: "Re: 2.4.21-ck3"
Previous message: Lou Langholtz: "Re: Kernel Panic in 2.5.73-mm1 OOps part."
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just
stupid. We're saying what "bits" the device supports when
it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Gryniewicz: "Re: 2.4.21-ck3"
Previous message: Lou Langholtz: "Re: Kernel Panic in 2.5.73-mm1 OOps part."
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:17 EST