Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70

From: Bryan O'Sullivan (
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 14:56:52 EST

On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 12:18, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Does it only look this way or is your white space really broken?

I generated the patch with diff -b because my original changes fixed up
a lot of broken whitespace, which somewhat obscured the functional
changes. I'll send the plain diff -u instead next time.

> On UP the sync_core is not really needed, but more reliable. May be worth
> it to stick into an #ifdef though.


> > }
> >
> > + call++;
> > +
> What's that?

Oops - a piece of instrumentation that got left behind from trying to
fix an SMP deadlock.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:29 EST