Re: [RFC] New system device API

From: Patrick Mochel (
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 16:15:20 EST

> Okay, but you should keep "new" functions as similar to existing ones
> as possible. That means 3 parameters for suspend functions, and as
> similar semantics to existing callbacks as possible.

Did you read the earlier posts? They are similar, and simplified because
they don't need the level, since all suspend/resume is expected to happen
with interrupts disabled. The semantics are obvious, the deviation
trivial, and this thread a dead horse.

Please present a case in which that will not work and I will change the

> > So? A keyboard controller is not classified as a system device.
> Its not on pci, I guess it would end up as a system device...

Huh? Since when is everything that's not PCI a system device? Please read
the documentation, esp. WRT system and platform devices.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:21 EST