Followup to: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
By author: Linus Torvalds <email@example.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Ryan Anderson wrote:
> > This uses the same method as previously was used, it just performs the
> > lookup at runtime.
> I much prefer a compile-time thing.
> Performance is, to me, paramount for "checker". I don't want to slow it
> down, I'm hoping that some day we can just enable C=1 by default in the
> kernel build (this is a _long_ time off, though, don't you all start
> worrying now).
> I don't see anything wrong with a compile/install time thing, that is,
> after all, how gcc too works.
Both of these seem a little unnecessary. Why not pass this stuff on
the command line, and have the top-level Makefile extract the paths
into a command-line argument?
-- <firstname.lastname@example.org> at work, <email@example.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:19 EST