Re: 2.5.69-mm8 improvements and one oops

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 15:07:31 EST


jjs <jjs@tmsusa.com> wrote:
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:614!
> invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c011d762>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010246
> EIP is at schedule_tail+0xe2/0x140
> eax: 00000008 ebx: 00000000 ecx: d65d4e40 edx: d563c000
> esi: d8fa0120 edi: d953a31c ebp: d563dfb8 esp: d563df9c
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process bonobo-activati (pid: 1275, threadinfo=d563c000 task=d65d54c0)
> Stack: 43297d43 7d43297d 297d4329 43297d43 7d43297d d8fa0120 d65d54c0
> d564ffbc
> c010a362 d8fa0120 01200011 00000000 00000000 00000000 40018da8
> bfffe148
> 00000000 0000007b 0000007b 00000078 ffffe410 00000073 00000202
> bfffe0ec
> Call Trace:
> [<c010a362>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x14
>

You hit the free-of-a-freed-task_struct bug.

sched.c:614 is

static inline void finish_task_switch(task_t *prev)
{
        runqueue_t *rq = this_rq();
        struct mm_struct *mm = rq->prev_mm;

        rq->prev_mm = NULL;
        finish_arch_switch(rq, prev);
        if (mm)
                mmdrop(mm);
        if (prev->state & (TASK_DEAD | TASK_ZOMBIE))
                put_task_struct(prev); <== here
}

and my put_task_struct is:

#define put_task_struct(tsk) \
        do { \
                BUG_ON((tsk)->debug == 0x6b6b6b6b); \
                if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(tsk)->usage)) \
                        __put_task_struct(tsk); \
        } while (0)

This bug has been hanging around for ages. It is very rare and nobody
knows what causes it.

Are you running preempt? SMP? Is it repeatable?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:51 EST