Hi,
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> > >>-adfs-objs := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o
> > >>+adfs-y := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Why have two methods of doing the same thing? foo-y is clearly the
> > preferred method because it is easy to work with conditionals.
>
> I tend to agree, though I don't feel strongly about it. Having two
> different methods of expressing the same thing will always be confusing.
Has the new syntax any advantage, e.g. does it make sense to have adfs-m?
Otherwise the -obj syntax looks IMO more readable and it directly says
that this is a composite object.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:41 EST