On Mon, 19 May 2003, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:51:09PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> >
> >>Convert foo-objs to newer-style foo-y.
> >
> >
> > The paths looks correct.
> > But do we really want to go that far, and deprecate the -objs syntax?
> >
> >
> >>-adfs-objs := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o
> >>+adfs-y := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o
> >
> >
> > The patch contains a lot of changes like the above - and they
> > are only relevant if we deprecate the -objs syntax.
>
> Why have two methods of doing the same thing? foo-y is clearly the
> preferred method because it is easy to work with conditionals.
I tend to agree, though I don't feel strongly about it. Having two
different methods of expressing the same thing will always be confusing.
OTOH, 2.4 does only support "-objs", so people may get confused anyway,
and annoyed about having two different Makefiles to maintain in 2.4 and
2.5. Then again, the Makefiles between 2.4 and 2.5 have other differences
already, and since they're small and rarely changing, maintaining two sets
isn't so much of a pain.
So I would suggest:
o Change "-objs" to "-y" in 2.5
o Warn / error about the deprecated use in 2.5 when "-objs" is
encountered.
o Possibly add "-y" support to 2.4 (it's a pretty trivial change)
Ok?
--Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:40 EST