Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 05:54:42 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Next in thread: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
   Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 06:06:40 +0100

   Who reviewed this driver before inclusion?

This one goes all the way back to when Werner still maintained
the ATM layer, and frankly back then we didn't give a crap
about these issues as much as we do now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Next in thread: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:27 EST