Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 07:01:45 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, May 08 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2003-05-08 at 08:56, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > That part is added, I still kept it at 65535 though akin to how we don't
> > use that last sector in 28-bit commands either. For 48-bit commands this
> > is totally irelevant, 32MiB or 32MiB-512b doesn't matter either way.
>
> Actually I changed the LBA28 code to use the last sector a while ago. It
> has (unsuprisingly) caused zero problems because other OS's also
> generate such requests.

That's great, if you remember that was my requirement for usage of the
last sector, that the Other OS used it. If it does, it can't be buggy.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ATM] [PATCH] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE he_init_one()"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:27 EST