Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (acme@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 18:13:25 EST

Next message: Pascal Schmidt: "Re: [PATCH 2.5] report unknown NMI reasons only once"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Em Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 06:52:01PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:22:18 +0100 (BST)
> > A RAID-0 array and regular backups are the best way to protect your
> > data.
>
> RAID-1 obviously ;-)

Have you considered this:

http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/reisner/drbd/

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pascal Schmidt: "Re: [PATCH 2.5] report unknown NMI reasons only once"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST