Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

From: Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 12:54:57 EST

Next message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: ISDN massive packet drops while DVD burn/verify"
Previous message: George Chang: "system hang when running a kernel module program invloving file operations and exchange of arrary of character"
In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 18:22, John Bradford wrote:
> A RAID-0 array and regular backups are the best way to protect your
> data.

I assume you meant a RAID-1 or RAID-10 array ;-)

-- Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Linux Registered User #287198

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: ISDN massive packet drops while DVD burn/verify"
Previous message: George Chang: "system hang when running a kernel module program invloving file operations and exchange of arrary of character"
In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST