Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:32:59 EST

Next message: Lukasz Trabinski: "Re: 2.4.21-pre7 - aic79xx"
Previous message: Philippe Gramoullé : "Re: 2.5.67-mm3: Bad: scheduling while atomic with IEEE1394 then hard freeze ( lockup on CPU0)"
In reply to: john stultz: "[PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Next in thread: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Reply: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a race in the timer_interrupt code caused by
> detect_lost_tick().

Does this also fix the problem which Alex identified?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lukasz Trabinski: "Re: 2.4.21-pre7 - aic79xx"
Previous message: Philippe Gramoullé : "Re: 2.5.67-mm3: Bad: scheduling while atomic with IEEE1394 then hard freeze ( lockup on CPU0)"
In reply to: john stultz: "[PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Next in thread: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Reply: john stultz: "Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.67_lost-tick-fix_A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST