Re: [PATCH] reduce stack in cpqarray.c::ida_ioctl()

From: Jörn Engel (joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:54:23 EST

Next message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: [PATCH] only use 48-bit lba when necessary"
Previous message: Chuck Ebbert: "[BUG?][2.5.66] was: Re: How to fix the ptrace flaw without rebooting"
In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH] reduce stack in cpqarray.c::ida_ioctl()"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] reduce stack in cpqarray.c::ida_ioctl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 4 April 2003 08:44:09 +0000, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:56:52 +0200 Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote:
>
> | On Thu, 3 April 2003 17:33:52 +0000, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> | >
> | > | > + error = copy_to_user(io, my_io, sizeof(*my_io)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> | > |
> | > | copy_to_user returns the bytes successfully copied.
> | > | error is set to -EFAULT, if there was actually data transferred?
> | >
> | > Did you verify that?
> |
> | Yes, but I do make mistakes. Better double-check it yourself.
>
> Oh, I did. That's why I am asking you.

It was my mistake. I got confused reading uaccess.h. Sorry about that.

Jörn

-- 
Time? What's that? Time is only worth what you do with it.
-- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: [PATCH] only use 48-bit lba when necessary"
Previous message: Chuck Ebbert: "[BUG?][2.5.66] was: Re: How to fix the ptrace flaw without rebooting"
In reply to: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH] reduce stack in cpqarray.c::ida_ioctl()"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] reduce stack in cpqarray.c::ida_ioctl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST