Re: [PATCH] module load notification try 2

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 20:15:25 EST


On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:36:26PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:

> > +static inline int register_module_notifier(struct notifier_block * nb)
> > +{
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't fail just because !CONFIG_MODULES: should just return 0.

Ho-de-hum, flipped a coin, lost the toss.

> Otherwise there's no way to sanely use them without wrapping in #ifdef

Well, "if (err && err != -ENOSYS)". The relative sanity of that is
debatable. I don't care either way, hence the coin toss.

I Cc:ed Zwane who was advocating -ENOSYS on IRC ...

> > +static DECLARE_MUTEX(notify_mutex);
>
> Hmm, yes, you need to use your own protection around
> notifier_chain_register and notifier_call_chain. Wierd, because
> notifier.c does its own locking for register and unregister, but not
> for calling, which AFAICT makes it useless...

I mentioned about this some time ago on lkml to massive indifference.
Later on someone from OSDL reworked all the notifier stuff, dunno what
happened to the patch.

regards,
john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:18 EST