On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > Does the below patch fix your problem ?
> With your patch, mystress.pl was marked to get killed, every PID only
> once, no apache or similar (good). ... But the strange thing is, that it
> seems none of the processes, which are marked to be killed, get killed.
> So sysrq-t tells me.
It'd be interesting to know where these processes are spending
their CPU time and why they're not catching their signals.
> Sysrq-i gave me the chance to get out of the OOM killing process and
> only kernel threads were left + getty's so I was able to log in again.
Strange, so sysrq-i manages to kill the processes, but the OOM
killer doesn't kill the processes ?
This is very suspect because the OOM killer uses force_sig in
the same way the sysrq-i handler does...
regards,
Rik
-- Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways. http://www.surriel.com/ http://kernelnewbies.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:39 EST