Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?

From: John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 16:58:25 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
Next in thread: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The GPL just says you have to distribute the source in its preferred
> form for making modifications.

What if BK *is* the perferred form?

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
Next in thread: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST